Talk:Pat Barker

Occupation	novelist
Language	English
Nationality	England
Alma mater	London School of Economics
Subject	memory, trauma, survival, recovery
Notable awards	Man Booker Prize, Guardian First Book Award
Children	Anna Ralph

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire High‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Pat Barker is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Classical Committee

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Classical Committee, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Classical Committee articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's Classical CommitteeWikipedia:WikiProject Women's Classical CommitteeTemplate:WikiProject Women's Classical CommitteeWomen's Classical Committee articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Cohen, Noam (January 31, 2011). "Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia's Contributor List". The New York Times.
"Interview: Wikipedia seeks to close gender gap". Times LIVE. 2011-12-08. Archived from the original on 2012-08-22. Retrieved 2012-08-22.

Name

What does "W" stand for in her name?117.221.178.239 (talk) 05:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Do to the ubiquity of her work (at least in the UK) this article could be larger. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.81.123 (talk) 13:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. But sadly Wikipedia does not expand itself! Francium12 (talk) 10:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just added some additional information to this article; mostly early biography stuff. I'll probably edit it more later. It really does need beefing up: she's a major, critically-acclaimed, award-winning novelist, and deserves better than this thin article. Sue Gardner (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Some thoughts

Sue, this is a great article expansion - well written, well structured, well cited. I've been tinkering around the edges: fully formatting the citations (tedious but oh-so-important for offline use, or when web sites get taken down or restructured); fixing up ambiguous wikilinks; and a few other details. I've also started an infobox (to the right) which you may or may not want to include in the article; if so, just copy and paste.

I have a few thoughts about the article. In general, I think the lead section (currently only 3 sentences) could really use some fleshing out. If you're still working on gathering info and citations, it may be best to hold off; it's usually easiest to write a strong lead after the rest of the article is pretty complete. Ideally, the lead section will be essentially a fairly complete, informative short article, and should clearly contextualize the article's subject. I think the current lead sentence is a bit suspect; while I agree (or rather take your word for) Barker's general importance, I think we need to be careful about how we state it, and how we cite it. First, about the citation: blogs like [1] this one, which does not appear to have any rigorous editorial structure or reflect any special expertise, are often considered unacceptable as reliable sources. I personally believe very firmly -- and believe that the RS guideline supports -- the idea that blogs like this are generally OK for sourcing fairly uncontroversial facts; but for a highly subjective (not to mention sought-after) claim like "most important," I think much stronger sourcing is required.

This same issue can also be addressed, to some degree, in the phrasing. I favor phrasing like "Pat Barker is an influential[CITE] contemporary novelist from England. Often considered one of the most important historical novelists of the early 21st century,[CITE] she writes about…" That's obviously a very rough cut, but you might want to play with it.

Also, a detail, and one that I see is a vestige from before you started working on the article: I would change the way her biography is introduced. Stating with authority that Shannon Monteith is her biography seems unusual. Many people could write biographies of her; it seems like a strong way to put it. Especially without a third-party citation to back it up. My inclination would be to take it out of the article text, and put a full citation to Monteith's book in the "Further reading" section.

Hope this helps -- I'll keep chipping away at the details! -Pete (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pat Barker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090410075919/http://www.nytimes.com/books/99/05/16/specials/barker-ghost.html to http://www6.nytimes.com/books/99/05/16/specials/barker-ghost.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Article

Some thoughts

Further reading section

External links modified